The two Quick schedule modes compared
Quick schedule collects answers in one of two ways. Choose based on whether your candidate times are already narrowed down. The mode cannot be changed later.
- Compared with
- Voting on proposed times / Collecting free hours
- Comparison terms and disclosure
- A comparison between features of our own service. No third-party services are compared.
Quick schedule needs no account
From the home page you can create a scheduling page without an account. Participants need no account either, and are not asked for an email address.
You choose one of two modes when you create it. It cannot be changed afterwards.
Voting on proposed times
You list candidate times and each person answers yes, maybe, or no for each one.
This suits the case where three to ten candidates are already in mind. Participants only have to choose, so answering is light work.
Collecting free hours
You set only the dates and the window of hours. Participants drag across a timeline to paint their own availability, marking each part as free, unsure, or unavailable.
The window for each date, and how finely it can be filled in, are yours to set.
This suits the case where candidates cannot be narrowed down first, or where the length of the meeting is itself under discussion.
Which to choose
Voting is the simpler place to start. Reach for collecting free hours when you cannot think of candidates, or there are enough participants that guessing their availability is hopeless.
What both share
Either way, the page lasts 90 days from the last activity; handing it over to an account removes that limit.
Neither mode sends confirmation emails or reminders, and neither offers calendar sync or automatic meeting URLs. Create an account if you need those.